Compare

Gutenburg vs. Conga Composer

Compare the products by the requirements that actually affect your Salesforce document workflow.

Comparison approach

Conga Composer enables Salesforce customers to populate templates with Salesforce data and supports multiple delivery and automation patterns. This page focuses on architectural and workflow differences that are useful during evaluation rather than trying to declare a universal winner.

Current public comparison points

Salesforce document generationYes — Composer is designed around Salesforce data and templates.
AutomationVendor documentation describes background automation, workflow use, Conga Batch and Conga Trigger.
Delivery/storageVendor documentation describes email, eSignature and external storage options.
Gutenburg distinctionGutenburg emphasizes Salesforce-native processing plus PDF accessibility/PDF-UA output as core design requirements.

Questions to ask both vendors

  • Where is Salesforce data processed during generation?
  • Which output formats are core to your use case?
  • How are templates created and governed?
  • How do Flow, batch, and Agentforce workflows operate?
  • What accessibility standard does the final PDF output support?
  • How are generated files stored, retained, delivered, and secured?
Sources and verification

Last reviewed 2026-09-02. Product comparisons use public vendor information; verify current capabilities directly with each vendor.

Conga Composer official product information →

Related Gutenburg resources

See it in Salesforce

Turn the document workflow into part of the Salesforce workflow.

Explore the interactive tour or open a conversation about the documents, automation, accessibility, and security requirements that matter to your organization.